Keep the video in mind as you read the following:
Tony Cartalucci - Just a Lousy Journalist? His writing focuses on the International dimension; the foreign interference in Thailand.
While there is no doubt that no nation is an island and foreign groups with their own agendas interfere in all nations for their own personal ends, Tony has been very selective in which foreign groups he writes on, what their intentions are and who they work with in Thailand.
I write now to expose some of the glaring omissions he has purposefully made and encourage you to ask; What groups does this foreigner in Thailand belong to and what is his agenda? I have been aware of his work for a year now. It started with the tragic events in Bangkok.
Protesters were gunned down, soldiers died too, and foreign journalists, nurses and emergency workers were killed too, even delivery boys going about their business were gunned down. It's important to point out at this juncture that the red in the Thai Flag represents the Thai people.
This is why they have chosen to be a Red Movement, it is not a left wing movement, it encompasses all of the common people of Thailand. Over the period of a year he continued along the same vein and added further incontestable facts to his writing.
Thaksin was in the Council on Foreign Relations. He has also continued with his nationalist ideological writing, praising the currently unelected government and Thai nationalists, while condemning all that they condemn with a fierce and violent passion; Highlighting some realities in Thailand such as the lax approach to enforcing Intellectual Property rights to essential drugs, which can not honestly be attributed to any political faction, and attributing them to the nationalists.
What follows is not so much a defence of the Red Movement, it's purpose is to provide a clearer and truer picture of the situation in Thailand.
A response to the nationalist demagoguery of Tony Cartalucci's contrived and deceptive polemic. Perhaps, we should start with some glaring omissions.
He was also a member of the Carlyle Asia Advisory Board. He, however, remained on the board for three years more than Thaksin, who left in Anand only left when the board was disbanded in He supported the military coup which ousted Thaksin and was surprised that the international community condemned it.
He has sat with George W. Bush at the Global Leadership Foundation. The list goes on and on.
And so, the first questions arises; Who is more intimately linked with Western interests? Who is 'handled by Globalist Masters'? Why was Anand surprised by international condemnation of the coup? Surin Pitsuwan Surin Pitsuwan is another opponent of Thaksin and a coup supporter.
Speaking at an 'Asian Voices' seminar in Brussels, Belgium, the director of Thailand's Democratic Party believed that democracy did not die in the coup led by army general Sonthi Boonyaratklin, but was, in fact, saved just in time.
The BBC quoted Senator Mechai Viravaidya as saying, "I'm delighted he's gone," He received money and an award from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for his work on family planning which saw one of the most rapid declines in fertility in modern history.Thoughts Aside.
Electronic data transaction emerged the concept of plastic money for consumers and made the bank procedures easy and available 24/7.
ATM accepts debit cards and give you access to your financial assets to make money vetconnexx.com usually use creditcard for online shopping..
Credit card is an example of credit debt. It is interesting to note, before anything, the similarities between Brave New World and Firstly and rather obviously, they are both prophetic novels, they were both written in turbulent times, both suffering changes that could revert the future of the world.
I’m an expert on how technology hijacks our psychological vulnerabilities. That’s why I spent the last three years as Google’s Design Ethicist caring about how to design things in a way that defends a billion people’s minds from getting hijacked.
To arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves. Arranged marriage is a type of marital union where the bride and groom are selected by individuals other than the couple themselves, particularly family members, such as the vetconnexx.coming on culture, a professional matchmaker may be used.
¨ Arranged marriages have historically been prominent in many cultures. The practice remains common in many regions, notably South Asia, though in many. Brave New World and Comparison Brave New World and both take place in a utopian and totalitarian society.
The citizens in these societies are controlled by the government, to the point where they do not think for themselves. In both and Brave New World, literature is restricted. The totalitarian government in.